Wills are supposed to make things simple. But sometimes, the words people use in their wills do the opposite. Relationship clauses—rules about who gets what based on family ties or behavior—can turn a private matter into a public fight. These clauses have led to some of the most talked-about court cases. If you’re writing a will or might inherit from one, you need to know how these clauses work. They can change everything for families, friends, and even charities.
Here are ten relationship clauses in wills that led to public trials, what happened, and what you can learn from them.
1. The “Marriage Approval” Clause
Some wills say a beneficiary only gets their inheritance if they marry someone the will-maker approves of. This clause has caused many court battles. In one famous case, a woman was cut out of her father’s will because she married someone he didn’t like. The court had to decide if the clause was fair or if it went against her rights. If you’re thinking about adding a marriage approval clause, know that courts often see them as controlling. They may not hold up in court, especially if they limit someone’s freedom to choose a partner.
2. The “No Divorce” Clause
A no-divorce clause states that a person forfeits their inheritance if they get divorced. This clause has led to public trials when people felt forced to stay in unhappy marriages. Courts have occasionally struck down these clauses, arguing that they contravene public policy. If you want to use this clause, be careful. It can backfire and cause more harm than good. It’s better to focus on positive incentives rather than punishments.
3. The “Must Have Children” Clause
Some wills require a beneficiary to have children to inherit. This clause has sparked lawsuits from people who can’t or don’t want to have kids. In one case, a man left his fortune to his son only if he had a child within five years. The son sued, arguing the clause was unfair. Courts look at whether the clause is reasonable and not discriminatory. If you’re considering this, think about the pressure it puts on people’s personal choices.
4. The “Stay in the Family” Property Clause
This clause says the property must stay in the family and can’t be sold to outsiders. It’s common with family homes or land. But it can cause problems if family members disagree or need to sell for financial reasons. In one public trial, siblings fought over whether they could sell the family farm. The court had to decide if the clause was too restrictive. If you want to keep property in the family, make sure your clause is clear and flexible.
5. The “No Contest” Clause
A no-contest clause says anyone who challenges the will loses their inheritance. These clauses are meant to stop lawsuits, but they often do the opposite. When someone feels cheated, they may challenge the clause itself. Courts in some states enforce these clauses, while others don’t. If you use a no-contest clause, make sure your will is clear and fair to avoid giving people a reason to fight.
6. The “Caregiver Exclusion” Clause
Some wills exclude caregivers from inheriting, especially if they’re not family. This is meant to prevent undue influence, but it can lead to public trials if the caregiver was genuinely close to the deceased. In one case, a longtime nurse was left out of a will after years of service. The family and the nurse ended up in court. If you want to exclude someone, explain your reasons clearly in a clear manner to avoid misunderstandings.
7. The “Religious Requirement” Clause
A religious requirement clause says a beneficiary must follow a certain religion to inherit. These clauses have led to heated court battles, especially when someone changes faiths. Courts often strike down these clauses if they see them as discriminatory. If religion is important to you, consider other ways to honor your beliefs without forcing them on others.
8. The “Reconciliation” Clause
This clause says a person can only inherit if they reconcile with a family member. It’s meant to heal rifts, but it can make things worse. In one public trial, a father’s will said his children had to make peace with each other to get their inheritance. The siblings ended up fighting in court instead. If you want to encourage reconciliation, talk to your family while you’re alive. Wills are not the best place for this.
9. The “Charity Over Family” Clause
Some wills leave everything to charity, cutting out family members. This can lead to public trials if family members feel wronged. Courts look at whether the person was of sound mind and not under pressure. If you want to leave money to charity, make your intentions clear and consider leaving something to family to avoid lawsuits.
10. The “Secret Relationship” Clause
A secret relationship clause tries to hide or reveal a relationship after death. For example, a will might leave money to a secret child or partner, sparking public trials when the truth comes out. These cases can be messy and painful for everyone involved. If you have a secret, think about the impact on your loved ones. Honesty now can prevent public drama later.
Why Relationship Clauses in Wills Need Careful Thought
Relationship clauses in wills can protect your wishes, but they often lead to public trials and family pain. The wrong words can turn a private matter into a headline. If you’re writing a will, talk to a lawyer and think about the real-life impact of your choices. Clear, fair clauses help your loved ones avoid court and keep your legacy intact.
Have you seen a will clause cause family drama or a court case? Share your story or thoughts in the comments.
Read More
No Sharing: 8 Reasons He Won’t Share His Vulnerabilities or His Money With You
13 Career Motivations That End in Loneliness
The post 10 Relationship Clauses in Wills That Sparked Public Trials appeared first on Clever Dude Personal Finance & Money.
