Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
International Business Times UK
International Business Times UK
World
Ria Pathak

'Reject the Evidence of Your Eyes': Users Say Renee Good ICE Shooting Is Straight Out of George Orwell's 1984 Playbook

The fatal shooting of Renee Nicole Good during an ICE operation in Minneapolis has sparked national outrage, not only over the killing itself but over how officials described it afterwards.

As video of the incident spread online, people online began invoking a familiar warning from George Orwell's 1984, arguing that the government's account of events asked the public to deny what they could plainly see — a striking similarity to the plot of one of the most highly regarded novels of all time.

What Happened in Minneapolis

On 7 January 2026, Renee Nicole Good, a 37-year-old US citizen from Minnesota, was shot and killed by an ICE agent during an immigration enforcement operation in south Minneapolis. Video footage shows Good seated in a van as federal agents surrounded her vehicle.

As she attempted to drive away, the van made low-speed contact with one agent. Moments later, the agent fired multiple shots into the vehicle at close range, striking Good in the face.

A screenshot of the ICE agent who allegedly shot Renee Good. (Credit: Facebook)

Good had reportedly just dropped her child off at school and was turning her vehicle around when agents approached. She was known to participate in an 'ICE Watch' group that monitored enforcement activity and had no documented history of violence, according to court records cited in subsequent reporting.

Despite video evidence showing the agent walking away unharmed, the Trump administration and Department of Homeland Security described Good as a 'domestic terrorist' who had 'violently and viciously run over' an officer.

President Trump said publicly that it was 'hard to believe [the agent] is alive,' a claim contradicted by reports confirming the officer was not hospitalised or seriously injured.

Video vs Official Narrative

The contrast between the footage and official statements quickly became the centre of public debate.

Critics pointed to the video as evidence that Good did not intentionally ram the agent, while supporters of ICE argued her actions amounted to using a vehicle as a weapon.

The FBI has taken control of the investigation, barring Minnesota state agencies from involvement, citing federal jurisdiction. As of 9 January, no charges have been announced against the agent, whose name has been reported inconsistently across outlets, but he is most commonly identified as Jonathan Ross. Meanwhile, protests have continued in Minneapolis amid ongoing ICE operations.

Why 1984 Keeps Getting Quoted

As the administration's version of events circulated, social media users, journalists, and commentators repeatedly cited a line from Orwell's 1984: 'The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.'

Writers at The Independent described the shooting and its aftermath as a 'dark chapter in the rewriting of history,' arguing that the insistence on a narrative contradicted by video echoed Orwell's themes of enforced belief and state-controlled truth.

Renew Democracy Initiative chair Garry Kasparov called the situation 'gaslighting,' warning that repeated false claims risk normalising manipulated reality.

On social media, users framed the incident as an example of authoritarian narrative control, urging others to 'trust the video' rather than official statements. The comparison gained traction amid renewed interest in Orwell's work, fueled in part by recent documentaries examining modern political parallels.

Polarised Reaction and Calls for Oversight

Public response has split sharply along political lines. Progressive voices described the shooting as an extrajudicial killing and accused ICE of operating with impunity.

George Orwell, the writer of 1984. (Credit: Pixabay)

Actress Amanda Seyfried condemned ICE on Instagram, calling it 'law enforcement run amok.' Musician Peter Frampton referred to the official explanation as a 'powerful lie,' also invoking Orwell.

Conservative commentators defended the agent, portraying Good as a trained activist who deliberately confronted federal officers. Some argued the Orwell comparison trivialises real authoritarian regimes and misrepresents the dangers officers face during enforcement actions.

As the investigation continues, the Renee Good shooting has become more than a single case; for many, it has indeed become a warning Orwell predicted decades ago.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.