Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
International Business Times UK
International Business Times UK
World
Aiza Moraña

'Predilection for Nipples': The Epstein File Claim About Trump That the White House Buried

Jeffrey Epstein socialised with Trump in the 1990s and early 2000s, including at Mar-a-Lago events. (Credit: Flickr/John Robert Mallernee)

An unverified claim about President Donald Trump's alleged 'predilection for nipples', recorded in the Jeffrey Epstein files, prompted crisis talks inside the White House, as senior officials moved to contain the fallout from the potentially damaging allegation in the summer of 2025.

According to The New York Times, during a briefing in the Situation Room, aides debated releasing the documents to satisfy public demand. The administration ultimately chose not to publish the specific allegation, fearing it would validate darker theories. This decision set off a chain reaction of internal disputes.

The Unverified Physical Abuse Allegation

The dispute centred on unsealed emails from Sarah Ransome, an accuser involved in civil litigation. Ransome claimed a girl named Jen shared accounts of Trump aggressively sucking and flicking her nipples. These emails became a key flashpoint inside the administration.

Ransome wrote that the injuries looked severe. 'They looked incredibly painful as they were red and swollen and I remember wincing when I looked at them,' she stated in the disclosed documents.

Although Ransome had credibility issues, officials worried about the uncorroborated claim's inclusion in a Department of Justice database. A private website test surfaced the material. Aides realised a government platform would lend undue validity to the accusations.

Vice President JD Vance Pushes For Full Disclosure

Vice President JD Vance argued for transparency during a 13 August meeting, suggesting they release all material to pre-empt speculation. Vance believed ripping the bandage off was the only workable strategy.

'I think we should put it out,' Vance told the room. He believed releasing the unverified claims would demonstrate the administration was ensuring total transparency. His proposal met immediate resistance from other advisers.

White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles rejected the suggestion. She confirmed the president would not approve releasing the documents detailing the physical abuse claims.

Internal Rifts And Backlash Over Suppression

Concealing the files led to sharp internal divisions. Federal official Dan Bongino forcefully opposed the administration's approach. He warned the base would see the suppression as a betrayal.

Bongino clashed with Wiles over accusations of leaked press information on 9 July. 'I'll give you £79,000 ($100,000) cash right now,' he shouted during the exchange. He denied any involvement in the leak.

Bongino insisted he had warned the team. 'No, no, no, no, no. We didn't get ourselves into anything. I warned you guys about this the whole time, and you ignored me,' he argued. He then left the room.

Bipartisan Law Triggers A Massive Document Release

Attempts to suppress the materials failed when the Epstein Files Transparency Act passed through both legislative chambers in late 2025. Lawmakers were determined to uncover the truth.

Trump signed the bill into law on 19 November, yielding to political pressure. The legislation mandated the prompt release of millions of pages. It explicitly prohibited redactions based on reputational harm for government officials.

The released documents contained over 38,000 references to the president and his properties. You can read more about the internal turmoil in a news report detailing the administration's defensive manoeuvres. The scale of the data dump overwhelmed efforts to manage the fallout.

Despite the release, the president denied wrongdoing. 'There are a lot of questions about it,' he stated to reporters in February 2026. 'But nothing on me.'

A memorandum drafted by chief pollster Tony Fabrizio noted the scandal ranked as the sixth most prominent issue among focus groups. The administration's inability to contain the narrative showed that the controversy remained a persistent feature of the president's second term.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.