During his testimony, David Pecker revealed that he would inform Michael Cohen about negative stories before they were published. Cohen's role was to verify the accuracy of the story and then approach the publication to prevent its release.
This revelation sheds light on the behind-the-scenes efforts to control the narrative in the media. It highlights the intricate relationships between key figures in the industry and their attempts to influence what information reaches the public.
Pecker's testimony underscores the importance of media gatekeepers and their impact on the dissemination of news. By having individuals like Cohen vet stories before publication, there is a level of control exerted over the information that is made available to the public.
These revelations raise questions about the ethics and transparency of media practices. The process of suppressing negative stories through preemptive actions challenges the principles of journalistic integrity and impartiality.
As more details emerge from testimonies like Pecker's, the public gains insight into the complex dynamics at play within the media landscape. It serves as a reminder of the power dynamics and influences that shape the news we consume.
